Chiang Mai vs Faro — Cost of Living Comparison 2026
Which city is cheaper, safer, and better for remote workers? Here's the data.
NoodlePants Verdict — generated from live data
Faro edges out Chiang Mai on affordability with a Cost of Living index of 6 vs 30.4 (US=100; very affordable vs very affordable). Faro scores higher on safety (80/100), and Chiang Mai wins on internet at ~180 Mbps. Overall, Chiang Mai takes the Nomad Score crown with 86/100 — best for budget nomad and long-stay nomad.
Metric
Chiang Mai
Faro
Avg Rent 1BR (city centre)
US$380
US$750
Avg Rent 1BR (outside centre)
US$250
US$550
Cost of Living (US=100)
30
6
Safety Score
78/100
80/100
Internet Speed
180 Mbps
90 Mbps
Nomad Score
86/100
8/100
Healthcare Score
74/100
72/100
Digital Nomad Visa
✓ Available
Not available
Who is each city for?
Chiang Mai is better for…
Budget nomadLong-stay nomadCoworkingSlow living
See the Thailand country profileAlso compare
See full city data — neighbourhood breakdowns, internet speeds & coworking scores
Pro unlocks 350+ nomad cities & neighbourhoods, district-level rent maps, live coworking inventory and PDF exports.